Posted by
DMCourt on Sunday, November 04, 2007 1:22:49 AM
An excellent book which traces the blurring of distinctions between childhood and adulthood in contemporary society.
It
starts out with an overview of childhood. leading to a discussion of
how the concept of the teenager is a relatively recent development.
Booth Tarkington's novel
Seventeen
was the first that dealt with teenagers specifically, but even then
teenage years weren't seen as a separate period but more as a
transition period where the aspiration was to become an adult. The main
character's goal in the book was to borrow his dad's tuxedo -- a symbol
of adulthood -- to impress a girl.
West pinpoints the beginning
of the concept of "teen years" as a state distinct and separate from
childhood and adulthood to the period just after WWII. Eventually, this
emphasis leads to the elevation of the teenager years to a desired
status, where before becoming an adult was the goal. By the fifties,
being and acting like a teenager is a goal unto itself.
Which
then leads to the wish to live in the teen period as long as possible,
leading to a blurring of the lines between childhood/teen/adult
behavior. That is, children who are encouraged by their peers (and
advertising) to behave as teens at younger and younger ages. The slutty
dress, acting out of sexual behavior, knowledge beyond their years.
What
the book doesn't mention that I think is a factor also, is all the
hormones that have been pumped into meat. It is common now for girls as
young as 9 to begin developing prematurely. I'm not sure if something
similar is happening with boys. The media don't seem inclined to report
on it and everybody seems pretty unconcerned. I guess since they're
already being pushed to sophistication, that their bodies are being
pushed also by chemicals doesn't seem to matter.
To get back to
the book, this same elevation of the teen years leads to the wish to
remain in it for as long as possible. We're seeing "adults" in their
twenties and even thirties who wish to avoid responsibility, to play
and have fun over settling down, working on a career and, most
important, parenting.
Since many people start their childbearing
years in their late teens and twenties, we're getting parents who don't
want to parent. That, coupled with the children who are expected to be
preternaturally sophisticated, means we're getting people of all ages
who engage in adult pastimes without the judgement or common sense to
handle it.
The book goes on to trace how our lack of
responsibility leads to a breakdown of boundaries, continual lowering
of standards of decency and behavior. No sense of shame or knowledge of
what is inappropriate. "Who are we to say X is bad" or immoral or
wrong. With relativism, no type of behavior is better or worse than any
other type of behavior.
This has lead naturally to cultural
leveling (IE, no culture is better than any other culture) has lead to
a loss of cultural identity. It's our biggest handicap when dealing
with the Islamic threat. Since they know what they believe and we
don't, we're at a disadvantage when it comes to fighting them.
To quote from the book:
There
is a hollowness to the whole enterprise that is embodied by the
captain's relativism, a barren chamber where the empty slogan "war on
terror" echoes on without meaning. That is, terror is a tactic. You
don't make war on a tactic, you make war on the people that use it.
Imagine if FDR had declared "the war on sneak attack" or the "war on
blitzkrieg." It doesn't make sense and neither does "war on terror."
And not only does it not make sense, it also uncovers our biggest
handicap going in: that perilous lack of cultural confidence, that
empty core at our heart. Where an empty core has nothing with which to
refute the absurdity of Bush=Hitler, an empty core has nothing with
which to define "a war on terror." Who are we to say . . . who we are
fighting . . . and why? p.143
Unfortunately,
the book doesn't give much in the way of solutions. There are still
plenty of people, I think, who become adults, even if it is later in
life. But are there enough of them? And if adulthood is postponed until
after 30, will they be too late to make a significant difference? Will
there be enough people willing to to turn things around?